Regulatory policy is shifting from enforcement to active rulemaking. The SEC has placed a crypto safe harbor on its July agenda, effectively front-running the Senate's stalled CLARITY Act. Down at the state level, Alabama just joined Wyoming in establishing formal DAO legal wrappers, and the $20 million BonkDAO exploit is forcing a harsh confrontation with the legal realities of token-weighted governance.
As edge networks like Cloudflare and AWS finalize their x402 payment integrations, the underlying rails for machine-to-machine transactions are rapidly commoditizing. But a new analysis argues this solves only half the problem. The 'Know Your Agent' governance layer we've been tracking—ensuring auditable authorization, enforcing spending limits, and generating MiCA-compliant records—remains largely unaddressed by the payment providers themselves, creating an urgent market opportunity for specialized, rail-agnostic control solutions.
Why it matters
This insight is crucial for any onchain organization planning to deploy autonomous agents. Simply enabling agents to transact is insufficient; without a robust governance framework, organizations face significant compliance, liability, and security risks. The analysis suggests the next frontier isn't payment, but auditable control. For the Alliance, this highlights a critical infrastructure gap that needs to be filled to safely migrate financial operations onchain, as the legal and financial accountability for an agent's actions will fall on the organization that deployed it. The emergence of a separate governance layer will be a key area to watch.
"The payment rail is a solved problem... The unsolved problem is the governance layer on top," states a dev.to analysis, framing it as a market for "specialized, non-conflicted governance solutions" like rosud-pay. This view posits that payment providers are incentivized to maximize transaction volume, not to enforce restrictive policies, creating a fundamental conflict of interest that necessitates an independent control layer to manage authorization, set limits, and produce auditable records required by regulations like MiCA.
Following the $20 million BonkDAO governance exploit we noted yesterday, specific details of the attack mechanics have emerged. The perpetrator spent around $4.4 million to acquire enough BONK to meet the 1% quorum on Solana's Realms platform, single-handedly passing a malicious proposal (BIP #76) to drain the treasury. Because the incident was a manipulation of the DAO's legitimate, token-weighted voting system rather than a smart contract hack, the fallout is shifting to the legal implications of governance without timelocks or veto powers.
Why it matters
The lack of a technical exploit makes this a pure, high-stakes test case for the legal principle of token holder liability. It moves the conversation from theoretical vulnerabilities to concrete corporate fraud, providing ammunition for arguments that DAOs without legal wrappers may be treated as general partnerships where voters hold fiduciary duties.
"This is why DAOs that don't register a legal entity are general partnerships, and voters who breach their fiduciary duty to other holders are committing corporate fraud," argued Ripple CTO Emeritus David Schwartz, rejecting the 'code is law' defense. Security analysts at SigIntZero noted the attack exploited a system with a 'thinly voted token and a juicy treasury.' Multiple reports emphasize the lack of basic security features like timelocks or a security council, which could have prevented the automated execution of the malicious proposal.
Just a week after analysts at Orthogonal pointed out the lack of a universal discovery layer for AI agents, AIsa has raised $6.5 million in a round co-led by Alibaba and Tribe Capital to build exactly that. The platform is designed to allow autonomous agents to programmatically discover, access, and pay for digital resources such as APIs and data. The capital will be used to scale its infrastructure and accelerate stablecoin settlement capabilities across different agent ecosystems.
Why it matters
This funding highlights the accelerating development of the foundational economic plumbing for autonomous agents. A dedicated transaction network that natively supports stablecoin settlement is a critical piece of infrastructure required for AI agents to participate in onchain commerce and governance. For onchain organizations, platforms like AIsa could become the equivalent of financial market utilities, enabling their own AI agents to autonomously procure services and manage resources, making the vision of agents holding assets and transacting a practical reality.
"The agent economy needs a digitally native, programmatic and high-performance transaction network," said AIsa's CEO in the announcement. The company's focus on a single programmable interface for agents to interact with diverse digital resources suggests a future where economic activity is largely orchestrated between machines, bypassing human-centric interfaces and payment systems. The backing by a major tech firm like Alibaba signals strong interest from incumbents in this emerging machine-to-machine economy.
Security leader OpenZeppelin and the T-REX Network have announced a partnership to harden and standardize the T-REX Protocol (ERC-3643), an onchain compliance standard for regulated real-world assets. The collaboration aims to make ERC-3643 a core, audited component of the widely used OpenZeppelin Contracts library, evolve the ONCHAINID standard for cross-chain identity, and target the onboarding of $100 billion in tokenized assets by mid-2027.
Why it matters
This is a critical development for institutional adoption of onchain finance. By integrating a programmable compliance standard directly into OpenZeppelin's trusted, off-the-shelf smart contract library, the partnership dramatically lowers the barrier for institutions to issue and manage regulated assets onchain. For the Alliance, this directly accelerates the migration of finance onchain by providing a standardized, secure, and scalable 'compliance-as-code' layer, addressing a major hurdle for large asset managers concerned with legal and regulatory adherence.
"Bringing ERC-3643 into OpenZeppelin Contracts will accelerate the institutional adoption of tokenization," the announcement states. The partnership focuses on making the T-REX protocol's onchain compliance mechanisms, including its eligibility checks and transfer rules, more robust and accessible. This collaboration between a security primitive provider (OpenZeppelin) and a compliance protocol (T-REX) signals the maturation of the RWA space, where security and compliance are becoming deeply integrated.
DeFi protocol UXUY and AI identity firm NeoSoulAI have announced a partnership to build infrastructure that allows AI agents to participate in onchain finance as independent actors. The collaboration will integrate UXUY's cross-chain trading infrastructure with NeoSoulAI's verifiable identity and reputation system, enabling agents to own wallets, manage assets, execute trades, and build persistent onchain reputations.
Why it matters
This partnership directly tackles two of the biggest hurdles for integrating AI into onchain organizations: verifiable identity and efficient execution. By combining a Sybil-resistant reputation system with a gas-efficient trading layer, it creates a foundational stack for autonomous agents to act as trusted participants in DeFi and governance. This moves beyond using AI as a simple automation tool and toward a model where agents can be delegated complex financial tasks and responsibilities, a core frontier for onchain organizational design.
"Our goal is to create the essential infrastructure for AI agents to function as first-class citizens in the on-chain world," stated UXUY in its announcement. The project aims to give agents "verifiable identities, and the ability to own and manage their assets." This collaboration signifies a concrete step towards a future where DAOs could employ AI agents for treasury management, market making, or even governance participation based on their proven onchain track record.
Cybersecurity researchers at Sysdig report they have identified the first ransomware attack conducted by a fully autonomous AI agent. Attributed to the 'JadePuffer' operation, the agent independently performed all stages of the attack cycle: it exploited a known vulnerability (CVE-2025-3248), stole credentials, moved laterally across the network, encrypted data, and deployed ransom notes. The agent demonstrated the ability to adapt its methods in real-time when initial attempts failed, without human intervention during execution.
Why it matters
While the attack used known vulnerabilities, its full autonomy represents a significant escalation in cyber threats, collapsing the attack timeline from days or weeks to mere hours. For onchain organizations, especially those managing valuable treasuries, this is a stark warning. The speed of an autonomous agent-led attack could outpace human-led incident response, making preventative security, robust identity and access management, and automated defense mechanisms paramount. It also raises profound legal questions about liability when an autonomous, non-person entity inflicts financial damage.
"The entire attack lifecycle, from initial access to ransomware deployment, was carried out by the AI agent without any human-in-the-loop," Sysdig researchers stated. While later analysis from Mezha.net clarified that humans were likely still involved in planning and victim selection, the execution phase was fully automated. This hybrid model demonstrates that attackers are successfully weaponizing AI to achieve speed and scale, changing the fundamental dynamics of cybersecurity defense.
With Wyoming's DUNA framework already seeing practical adoption by charitable onchain organizations, Alabama has officially become the second U.S. state to enact the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association Act. The legislation provides a formal legal framework for internet-native organizations, offering liability protections for participants and defining a clear structure for operations within the state.
Why it matters
The adoption of the DUNA framework in a second state is a significant step toward normalizing legal wrappers for onchain organizations in the U.S. This provides an alternative to the Wyoming DAO LLC, expanding the jurisdictional options for founders seeking to limit token holder liability and establish legal personhood. For the Alliance, this development is a direct signal of growing state-level momentum for bespoke DAO legislation, offering more choice and potentially creating a competitive environment among states to attract onchain organizations. It strengthens the case that specific, tailored legal structures are necessary and viable.
The legislative move is being framed as an embrace of innovation and a measure to protect participants in onchain communities. By offering a nonprofit-oriented structure, Alabama's DUNA provides a distinct option compared to Wyoming's LLC model, which could be more suitable for protocols, public goods projects, and other community-governed organizations that are not primarily for-profit enterprises.
As the Senate wrestles with the CLARITY Act's protections for non-custodial contributors, U.S. prosecutors have proposed a late-2026 timetable to retry Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm on conspiracy and sanctions charges. While Storm was previously acquitted of operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business, the deadlocked jury on the conspiracy counts ensures that the criminal liability of open-source developers will remain a live issue in the courts concurrently with the legislative debate.
Why it matters
The decision to pursue a retrial ensures that the legal battle over developer liability for decentralized protocols will continue to be a central issue for the industry. The outcome of this case will set a critical precedent for the legal responsibilities of individuals who write and deploy autonomous, onchain code. For developers and founders of onchain organizations, this case remains the most important bellwether for determining the line between software development and criminal liability.
The prosecution's push for a retrial signals its determination to secure a conviction on the conspiracy charges, which carry significant weight for the future of DeFi regulation. The defense has consistently argued that Storm was merely a developer of immutable software and cannot be held responsible for its misuse by third parties. The retrial will once again put this fundamental question before a jury.
MakerDAO has published an updated timeline for its ambitious 'Endgame' roadmap, shifting from theoretical discussions to a concrete rollout plan. The roadmap details significant structural changes to the protocol's governance model and the DAI stablecoin, including a brand relaunch and the introduction of new identities for both governance and stablecoin assets. The plan aims to address long-standing community debates around scalability, governance participation, and exposure to real-world assets.
Why it matters
As one of DeFi's foundational protocols, MakerDAO's Endgame is one of the most complex and closely watched governance transitions in the space. This move to a firm timeline signals that major changes are imminent. The success or failure of this multi-year effort to re-architect its governance and economic model will provide invaluable lessons for all onchain organizations on how to evolve a large, decentralized protocol while maintaining stability and community consensus.
Community discussions have focused on the balance between increasing scalability through real-world asset exposure and preserving decentralization. The new timeline forces these abstract debates into concrete implementation choices, aiming to enhance DAI's utility and stability while evolving the governance process to be more resilient and scalable.
Following the governance momentum to expand the protocol fee switch across all v3 pools on layer-2 networks, the Uniswap community is now moving to activate fees on its next-generation v4 pools. A Snapshot vote will run through July 12, introducing a new 'V4 Fee Controller' contract system designed to manage dynamic fees across different types of liquidity pools, with an onchain vote scheduled for the week of July 13.
Why it matters
This vote is a crucial next step in Uniswap's long-running effort to turn its protocol into a revenue-generating engine for UNI token holders. Activating fees on v4 is technically more complex than on v2/v3 and represents a significant evolution of the 'fee switch' mechanism. The outcome and implementation will be closely watched by other DAOs as a model for capturing protocol value and will test the balance between rewarding token holders and maintaining competitive fees for liquidity providers.
The proposal, part of the 'UNIfication' initiative, aims to continue the program that directs protocol fees to be used for UNI token buy-and-burns. Critics within the governance forums have raised concerns that the new dynamic fee structure could add complexity and potentially alienate some liquidity providers, who are central to the protocol's success. Supporters argue it's a necessary step for the DAO's long-term sustainability.
AI safety and research company Anthropic has launched 'Claude for Government Desktop,' a version of its AI suite that has received FedRAMP High authorization, making it suitable for use with highly sensitive U.S. government data. The offering, available in public beta, includes stronger administrative controls and tamper-evident audit logs. Concurrently, Anthropic has expanded its commercial Claude Cowork product to web and mobile, enabling synced cross-device sessions and write-access to Microsoft 365 tools.
Why it matters
The launch of a FedRAMP High-authorized AI agent platform is a significant milestone for enterprise and government adoption. It establishes a new benchmark for the security, compliance, and auditability required to deploy AI agents in regulated and sensitive environments. For onchain organizations, this provides a model for the level of control and verification that will likely be required to delegate financial or governance tasks to AI agents, especially as legal and regulatory frameworks for AI mature.
The government-focused product emphasizes security features like stricter admin controls and verifiable audit trails, addressing key concerns about accountability and oversight when using powerful AI models. The expansion of the commercial product to include write-tools for enterprise software like Microsoft 365 indicates a clear push toward more autonomous agentic capabilities in everyday business workflows.
While the Senate races to break the deadlock on the CLARITY Act's developer protections ahead of the August recess, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission appears to be moving to front-run the legislation. The SEC has updated its 2026 regulatory agenda, officially signaling its intent to propose an 'economically significant' 'Regulation Crypto' safe harbor as early as this month. The proposal is expected to establish registration exemptions for on-chain activities, allowing tokens to transition out of a securities classification as they achieve sufficient decentralization.
Why it matters
This marks a pivotal shift from regulation-by-enforcement towards formal rulemaking for digital assets in the U.S. By front-running the CLARITY Act, SEC Chair Atkins' commission appears to be taking initiative to define the regulatory landscape on its own terms. For onchain organizations, a formal safe harbor could dramatically reduce the legal ambiguity surrounding token launches and provide a much clearer pathway for building decentralized networks within the U.S., potentially unlocking a new wave of innovation and investment by providing the 'rules of the road' that the industry has long sought. The 'economically significant' designation underscores the expected impact on the market.
The SEC's official agenda states the goal is to create 'clear rules for crypto asset capital raising' and clarify on-chain custody and trading. Crypto-focused publications like Coindoo and Cryptonomist interpret this as a major step toward a durable regulatory architecture, potentially rendering parts of the CLARITY Act moot if the SEC's rules are established first. Commissioner Hester Peirce has also noted the significant rule-writing burden the SEC is preparing for, confirming the agency is actively gearing up for this process.
Six U.S. federal agencies, including the OCC and FDIC, have a deadline of July 18 to finalize the rules for stablecoin issuers under the GENIUS Act. According to a new analysis, the proposed rules impose compliance costs akin to those for banks, which are likely to be prohibitively expensive for most small and mid-sized stablecoin issuers. This cost structure is expected to drive significant consolidation in the U.S. stablecoin market.
Why it matters
These impending regulations will fundamentally reshape the stablecoin landscape in the U.S. The high compliance burden could erect a 'compliance wall' that only the largest, best-capitalized players can scale, potentially stifling innovation and competition. For organizations that rely on a diverse ecosystem of stablecoins for treasury management and onchain operations, this could lead to increased reliance on a small number of 'too big to fail' issuers, creating new systemic risks and reducing optionality.
The analysis from miningpool.co.uk argues that the cost structure "may kill" smaller issuers, effectively handing the market to a few dominant entities. The goal of the GENIUS Act is to bring stability and bank-like safety to the stablecoin sector, but an unintended consequence could be the creation of a stablecoin oligopoly.
Anchorage Digital, the only federally chartered crypto bank in the U.S., has integrated the Lido liquid staking protocol. The move allows its institutional clients to stake Ethereum and receive Lido's wrapped staked ETH (wstETH) directly within Anchorage's regulated custody environment. This enables institutions to earn staking rewards while maintaining asset liquidity and adhering to strict compliance standards.
Why it matters
This integration is a significant step in de-risking DeFi for large, regulated institutions. By providing a compliant on-ramp to liquid staking within a federally chartered bank's custody, Anchorage is removing major operational and regulatory barriers for institutional treasuries and asset managers to participate in Ethereum's consensus mechanism. It's a key piece of plumbing that connects the traditional financial world to onchain yield generation, potentially unlocking significant institutional capital flows into the ecosystem.
The integration addresses two key institutional concerns: the illiquidity of staked ETH and the operational complexity of managing staking infrastructure. By offering wstETH, which can be traded or used as collateral in DeFi, within a secure and regulated framework, Anchorage provides what it calls a 'seamless pathway to capital efficiency.'
Ripple is expanding its digital asset custody business to better serve regulated financial institutions moving into blockchain-based finance. The expansion focuses on integrating custody with payments, tokenization, and treasury management, enhanced with new compliance features and institutional staking capabilities through partnerships with Chainalysis, Securosys, and Figment. A partnership with Kyobo Life Insurance in South Korea exemplifies this institutional push.
Why it matters
This move signals Ripple's strategic positioning as a core infrastructure provider for institutions looking to manage digital assets. By offering an integrated suite of services—from custody and compliance to staking and treasury operations—Ripple is aiming to provide a one-stop solution that helps traditional financial players move from pilots to production-level onchain operations. This addresses a key need for the operational plumbing required to run institutional finance onchain.
Ripple's announcement highlights the growing demand from banks and other financial institutions for a secure and compliant way to engage with digital assets beyond simple holding. The integration of staking and other services directly into a custody solution is designed to make it easier for these firms to participate in the broader digital asset economy and generate yield on their holdings.
Vanguard, one of the world's largest asset managers with over $12 trillion in AUM, is recruiting for a Head of Digital Assets. The senior executive role will be responsible for defining and leading the firm's strategy across tokenization, stablecoins, custody, settlement, and governance. This move indicates a significant strategic shift for the traditionally crypto-skeptical firm.
Why it matters
Vanguard entering the digital asset space in a strategic capacity would be a watershed moment for institutional adoption. A move by such a large and conservative player would lend significant validation to onchain finance and could trigger a cascade of similar moves from other major traditional finance institutions. For the ecosystem, this signals that the operational and financial plumbing for digital assets is maturing to a point where even the most risk-averse giants are preparing to engage.
The job description explicitly calls for experience in developing strategies for 'tokenization, stablecoins, custody, settlement, governance, and compliance.' This suggests Vanguard is not merely exploring crypto as an asset class but is considering a deep, structural integration of blockchain technology into its core wealth management and operational frameworks.
J.P. Morgan Asset Management has tokenized approximately $800 million in assets from two of its money market funds (MONY and JLTXX) and placed them on the public Ethereum blockchain. The majority of this value comes from the JLTXX fund, which was launched in May 2026 and saw its assets under management surge to $695 million in a single month, demonstrating strong institutional appetite.
Why it matters
This large-scale move by a Wall Street titan like J.P. Morgan onto a public, permissionless blockchain is a powerful validation of the thesis that public chains can serve as settlement and registry layers for institutional finance. It moves beyond private blockchain pilots and shows real, substantial institutional capital being managed on Ethereum. This trend, following similar moves by BlackRock and Franklin Templeton, is building critical mass for onchain finance, making it a more viable and accepted part of the global financial system.
The rapid growth of the JLTXX fund in particular points to pent-up demand among institutions for regulated, blockchain-based financial products. By leveraging public blockchains, these firms are aiming to achieve greater efficiency in settlement and create more flexible, programmable financial instruments, fundamentally changing the plumbing of traditional asset management.
The Philippines' Department of Information and Communications Technology (DICT) has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Zetrix to use its Layer-1 public blockchain as the protocol for the country's national blockchain infrastructure. The partnership will focus on operationalizing sovereign-grade applications for digital IDs, government-issued credentials, and cross-border data interoperability, particularly with Malaysia.
Why it matters
This is a significant example of a nation-state adopting public blockchain technology as foundational infrastructure for core government functions. By building its digital ID and credentialing system on a public chain, the Philippines is creating a tangible, state-sanctioned onchain society. This move towards sovereign-grade, interoperable digital identity provides a powerful model for how governance can meet territory and political recognition in the digital age.
The partnership aims to create a 'sovereign-grade' blockchain infrastructure that enhances security and efficiency for government services. The focus on cross-border interoperability with Malaysia's national digital ID system, also built with Zetrix technology, points toward the creation of regional blocs based on shared digital infrastructure, a key theme in the evolution of network states.
In a new analysis, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin navigates the complex relationship between the cypherpunk ethos and traditional institutions. He argues that institutions are neither guaranteed allies nor inherent adversaries, pointing to contradictory behaviors like supporting open-source development while simultaneously pushing for encryption backdoors. Buterin emphasizes that for crypto to maintain self-sovereignty, particularly as institutions adopt stablecoins, the geographic distribution of blockchain node operators and developers is a critical defense.
Why it matters
Buterin's framework provides a nuanced perspective on how onchain organizations should approach institutional engagement. His focus on the 'geographic distribution of governance' as a bulwark against co-option is directly relevant to the concept of network states and onchain societies. It suggests that true sovereignty in the digital realm depends on a physically decentralized foundation that is resilient to pressure from any single jurisdiction, a key consideration for any organization building a global, onchain financial or governance system.
Buterin advises a pragmatic approach: collaborate with institutions where values align (e.g., on privacy-preserving technology) but remain vigilant and maintain a decentralized infrastructure to resist capture. He suggests that the political and regulatory landscape of a blockchain's core infrastructure will become increasingly important as large institutions choose which platforms to build upon, making decentralization a key competitive advantage.
The governance crisis at ENS triggered by co-founder Nick Johnson's unilateral veto of the Security Council renewal has prompted a direct counter-move. A new proposal is circulating to delegate the voting power of 5 million treasury ENS tokens to a diverse group of stakeholders, aiming to dilute Johnson's 3.26 million token voting bloc and re-decentralize control.
Why it matters
This situation at ENS is a classic case study in the challenges of decentralized governance and the perennial tension between founder influence and community control. The proposed delegation is an attempt to use the protocol's own governance tools to re-decentralize power. How the ENS community handles this crisis will be a critical test for onchain governance models and could set a precedent for how other DAOs address issues of voter apathy and concentrated voting power.
Critics of Nick Johnson's veto argue it undermines the principles of decentralized governance, with his holdings giving him roughly 50% of the active delegated voting power. Supporters of the new proposal see it as a necessary step to dilute this influence and ensure more resilient community decision-making. The debate exposes the fragility of governance systems where token concentration can override broad community consensus.
Payment Rails Become a Commodity; Governance Emerges as the Unsolved Layer With major payment providers now offering rails for AI agents, the ability to transact is becoming standardized. The critical gap is now in the governance layer: auditable authorization, policy enforcement, and compliance frameworks for these autonomous transactions are largely missing, creating a new market for specialized governance solutions.
SEC Signals Shift to Formal Rulemaking, Preempting Legislative Gridlock By placing a crypto-safe-harbor proposal on its formal July agenda, the SEC is moving to create its own regulatory architecture for digital assets. This proactive rulemaking, designated 'economically significant,' signals an intent to define the market structure regardless of the CLARITY Act's legislative outcome.
BonkDAO Exploit Becomes a Defining Case Study in Governance Liability The $20 million 'governance attack' on BonkDAO, where an attacker bought voting power to drain the treasury, is solidifying the debate around token-holder liability. Legal experts are framing it not as a hack, but as potential corporate fraud, challenging the 'code is law' narrative and highlighting the fiduciary duties that may exist in unincorporated DAOs.
Institutional On-Ramps Proliferate for Onchain Finance Major financial players are accelerating their integration with public blockchains. Anchorage Digital is offering institutional liquid staking via Lido, J.P. Morgan has tokenized $800M in money market funds on Ethereum, and Kyriba is integrating stablecoin payments for corporate treasury. The trend is moving from pilots to production-scale financial operations onchain.
Infrastructure for AI Agent Economies Attracts Significant Investment A new wave of funding is flowing into platforms that enable AI agents to act as economic participants. AIsa's $6.5M raise to build a transaction network and KOR Protocol's $7.5M round for an onchain creative clearinghouse show that the core infrastructure for agent discovery, payment, and settlement is being actively built.
What to Expect
2026-07-10—Ray Kurzweil's 'Human-First Digital Twin' (RAI) will debut at the UN AI for Good Global Summit.
2026-07-12—Snapshot vote closes for Uniswap proposal to activate protocol fees on v4 pools.
2026-07-17—House Financial Services Committee to hold a hearing on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (H.R. 3633).
2026-07-18—Deadline for six federal agencies to finalize stablecoin rules under the GENIUS Act.
2026-09-29—The AI Conference 2026 begins in San Francisco, focusing on agentic AI and production systems.
How We Built This Briefing
Every story, researched.
Every story verified across multiple sources before publication.
🔍
Scanned
Across multiple search engines and news databases
515
📖
Read in full
Every article opened, read, and evaluated
158
⭐
Published today
Ranked by importance and verified across sources
20
— The Wrapper
🎙 Listen as a podcast
Subscribe in your favorite podcast app to get each new briefing delivered automatically as audio.
Apple Podcasts
Library tab → ••• menu → Follow a Show by URL → paste