The Linux Foundation is formalizing DNS as the standard for autonomous agent identity, pushing back against proprietary trust platforms. Elsewhere today, the CFTC is auditing self-certification procedures at prediction market venues, and prominent Ethereum protocols are abandoning L2 rollups to return to mainnet.
Following the 'Chain of Trust' DNS architecture demonstrated by GoDaddy, Cloudflare, and others that we covered yesterday, the Linux Foundation officially adopted the Agent Name Service (ANS) as a hosted project on Tuesday, November 10. Supported by eleven founding organizations including Cisco, DigiCert, and Salesforce, the open-source specification defines seven core documents covering domain-anchored naming, public log auditing, integrity monitoring, and agent-to-agent authentication. The framework integrates cryptographic X.509 certificates with append-only logs to establish standardized identity and verification for autonomous AI agents without proprietary vendor lock-in.
Why it matters
For builders and founders designing agentic workflows, relying on proprietary identity platforms introduces massive vendor lock-in and interoperability risk. Anchoring agent verification in established internet primitives like DNS and X.509 certificates gives software teams an open, auditable control plane to issue and revoke machine credentials across organizational boundaries. This creates a predictable infrastructure layer for B2B agentic commerce, allowing enterprise buyers to verify non-human counterparty provenance before granting access to sensitive APIs or corporate treasuries.
GoDaddy's Scott Courtney highlights that leveraging DNS provides instant discoverability alongside decades of proven web security, while security maintainers note that append-only logs ensure non-repudiation. However, enterprise architects caution that domain-anchored identity must be paired with real-time authorization checks at the application layer to prevent compromised agent sessions from abusing legitimate domain credentials.
Building on the Agent Pay pilots and OpenAI partnership we tracked earlier this month, payments provider Clink added support for Mastercard's agentic rails on Monday, November 9, following similar B2B automation integrations by Visa, BILL, and Billtrust. Concurrently, technical analyses published by Fime and Payment Risk News on Tuesday, November 10, outline the required control layers for agent-initiated financial transactions, emphasizing a transition from static spending limits to contextual authorization and decision trails as enterprise CFOs pilot autonomous invoice processing.
Why it matters
The commercial barrier in B2B agentic software is no longer execution capability, but payment authorization and liability attribution. By embedding tokenized credentials directly into card network protocols, payment processors are creating the rails needed for autonomous procurement. This allows early-stage SaaS teams building agentic software to offload financial compliance and fraud risk to established payment rails rather than building bespoke payment gateways.
Card network providers position tokenized agent credentials as the safest bridge to automate enterprise procurement without exposing underlying corporate credit cards. Conversely, risk analysts argue that card networks only verify fund availability and identity, leaving a critical gap in verifying whether an agent's execution truly aligned with the human principal's underlying business intent.
Expanding on the wave of non-human identity control planes launched by major security vendors last month, BioCatch, LexisNexis, and Okta rolled out new access controls for agentic traffic on Wednesday, November 11. BioCatch introduced AiRE (Agentic AI Risk Essentials) to analyze session telemetry for agentic behavior, while LexisNexis rolled out Know Your Agent (KYA) intelligence following a 750% surge in agent traffic in H1 2026. Simultaneously, TrueFoundry and Okta integrated the Cross App Access (XAA) protocol to replace long-lived API tokens with short-lived, task-bounded credentials tied directly to authenticated human identities.
Why it matters
Static enterprise API keys and human-centric authentication models create massive authorization loopholes when autonomous agents operate on behalf of employees or customers. Transitioning to short-lived, scoped tokens via protocols like XAA ensures that non-human actors cannot exceed their explicit mandates or persist quietly inside enterprise systems. Building these identity rails allows organizations to safely deploy autonomous software without exposing backend databases to credential theft.
Okta and identity maintainers advocate that ephemeral, user-linked tokens provide necessary least-privilege security while maintaining full auditability across multi-app agent tasks. Conversely, autonomous software developers warn that overly restrictive credential lifespans and frequent re-authentication prompts introduce runtime errors and latency during long-running background tasks.
Dispute analyses published on Tuesday, November 10, by the Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP) working group and Shunhe Wang highlight a critical vulnerability in autonomous transactions: 72% of merchants lack defined policies for handling agent-initiated disputes, leaving sellers absorbing 100% of chargeback liability. Existing protocols like x402 and AP2 finalize payment authorization but lack standardized, machine-readable failure paths for post-purchase disagreements over item quality or delivery timestamps. UCP proposes a dedicated dispute resolution layer featuring cryptographic authorization chains, intent verification protocols, and an explicit liability attribution matrix to automate recourse.
Why it matters
Autonomous machine commerce executing on high-speed rails will collapse under the weight of manual customer support tickets and 90-day credit card chargeback cycles. Without standardized, machine-readable dispute protocols, merchants will simply block autonomous buying agents to avoid unmapped refund liabilities. Establishing programmatic evidence packages and clear recourse paths is essential infrastructure for scaling autonomous B2B and retail purchasing.
Protocol architects argue that standardizing discoverable recourse profiles and cryptographic intent trails shifts liability fairly and reduces dispute resolution from months to seconds. However, merchant advocacy groups caution that card networks currently favor buyers, meaning liability matrix proposals must win institutional support from payment processors before merchants can safely rely on them.
As outbound cold email response rates plummet—a trend driving the shift toward AI recommendation search we've been tracking—new data from 6sense's 2026 B2B Buyer Experience Report shows 82% of B2B SaaS deals are won by vendors favored before direct seller contact, exposing structural failures in traditional Marketing Qualified Lead (MQL) scoring. Growth teams are pivoting toward signal-based demand generation, replacing static form fills and generic cadences with real-time telemetry monitoring, such as tracking when target engineers review API documentation or competitor migration pages.
Why it matters
High-volume cold outreach is yielding near-zero response rates, forcing B2B founders to replace traditional SDR outbound stacks with signal-orchestrated GTM engineering. Capitalizing on buyer intent requires capturing dark social and technical evaluation signals before an account ever reaches out to sales. For early-stage startups, investing in machine-readable technical documentation and intent telemetry delivers significantly higher conversion rates than spending on top-of-funnel ad campaigns.
GTM strategists argue that MQL metrics incentivized vanity engagement points while failing to predict actual pipeline creation, making real-time intent signals the only reliable predictor of buyer interest. However, privacy engineers caution that over-relying on invasive intent tracking risks running afoul of stricter browser privacy policies and enterprise data controls.
As of Wednesday, November 11, prominent crypto applications including Synthetix, ENS, ShapeShift, Superseed, and Nillion are actively migrating core operations and smart contracts back to Ethereum mainnet from independent layer-2 rollups. Teams cite a 99% collapse in L1 gas costs—with ENS domain registration fees dropping under $0.05 following mainnet gas limit increases—alongside the severe liquidity fragmentation and maintenance overhead of running standalone L2 infrastructure. The move coincides with phased shutdowns announced by independent rollups like Blast and Abstract as maintenance costs outpace network revenues.
Why it matters
This migration directly challenges the dominant 'rollup-centric' scaling thesis that fragmented Ethereum's application ecosystem over the past three years. For founders choosing where to deploy smart contract infrastructure, low L1 execution costs make mainnet composability and shared security far more compelling than operating custom rollup infrastructure. Re-centralizing liquidity on L1 restores synchronous smart contract calls, removing cross-bridge security risks and complex user onboarding friction.
Migrating protocols emphasize that mainnet composability and reduced operational overhead far outweigh the theoretical throughput gains of isolated L2s. On the other hand, L2 infrastructure advocates contend that specialized rollups remain necessary for high-frequency application use cases that require sub-second block times and deterministic throughput guarantees.
In an analytical essay published on Tuesday, November 10, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin argued that ETH should not be valued primarily as a corporate fee-burning token under the 'ultrasound money' narrative. Buterin asserted that historical fee burns were driven by ephemeral internal crypto speculation and that optimizing the network purely to maximize burn rates compromises decentralization. Instead, he argued that ETH's long-term economic value is anchored in its role as a neutral Store of Value (SoV) backed by CROPS principles: censorship resistance, capture resistance, open source, privacy, and security.
Why it matters
Decoupling protocol value from short-term transaction fee burning reframes how institutional investors evaluate Ethereum's underlying asset. If mainnet execution remains cheap by design, ETH's investment thesis shifts from cash-flow yield to sovereign, censorship-resistant collateral. For protocol designers, this prioritizes formal verification and decentralization over chasing corporate transaction throughput.
Ethlabs researchers and protocol strategists support the shift, arguing that positioning ETH as a neutral, censorship-resistant settlement asset makes it far more attractive to institutional treasuries and global stablecoin issuers. Conversely, token economic bulls contend that abandoning the fee-burn narrative removes a direct programmatic link between network usage and token supply reduction.
Verified across 2 sources:
ZeroHedge(Nov 10) · AICoin(Nov 10)
Click Copy for AI above, then paste the prompt
into your favorite AI chatbot — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or
Perplexity all work well.
An analysis published by Multicoin Capital on Tuesday, November 10, outlines why financial software logic is rapidly commoditizing as AI coding models drive smart contract development costs to near zero. The paper argues that long-term economic value in decentralized finance will accrue to three non-software moats: distribution (owning direct customer interfaces and orderflow, such as Hyperliquid and MetaMask), balance sheet capital (prime brokerage and risk backstopping), and proprietary underwriting data. Consequently, headless backend protocols face severe pricing compression from user-facing applications.
Why it matters
For crypto founders and GTM strategists, building novel smart contract logic is no longer a defensible business model on its own. As frontends and wallets capture user attention, they extract the majority of transaction fees while switching between backend liquidity protocols at will. Defensibility requires building sticky distribution channels, accumulating balance sheet reserves, or capturing proprietary data feeds that cannot be replicated by automated software.
Multicoin analysts argue that frontends holding user relationships will command non-negotiable fee splits from underlying liquidity pools. On the other hand, open-source protocol advocates maintain that deeply liquid, immutable base protocols remain the core settlement layer that no frontend can easily replace without risking liquidity fragmentation.
Adding to the post-election Democratic regulatory push against prediction platforms we tracked yesterday, the CFTC issued a private warning to Kalshi on Tuesday, November 10, regarding potential enforcement charges over alleged procedural failures in its self-certification filing process. While Kalshi characterized the issue as an administrative oversight involving a small batch of mostly unlaunched products, reporting from Politico indicates the regulatory review covers dozens of contracts over several months. The probe arrives alongside broader CFTC inquiries into Polymarket's 2022 settlement compliance.
Why it matters
Rapid self-certification is the lifeblood of prediction market product velocity, allowing exchanges to list topical event contracts within hours of breaking news. Regulatory friction targeting filing procedures directly threatens this rapid listing model, potentially forcing exchanges into lengthy pre-approval reviews. For founders and traders relying on prediction markets for clean signal, administrative slowdowns reduce contract depth and liquidity when real-world information velocity is highest.
Kalshi maintains that the issue stems from minor administrative technicalities on non-impactful filings and does not affect live market integrity. Regulatory observers and congressional critics counter that unvetted self-certifications allow exchanges to skirt statutory gambling restrictions, necessitating strict procedural compliance to protect retail market participants.
Yesterday we covered Polymarket's preemptive federal lawsuit against Missouri; now, legal filings updated through Tuesday, November 10, show operators including Robinhood, Kalshi, and Novig are launching similar federal challenges against state cease-and-desist orders in Missouri and Arkansas. Circuit courts remain sharply divided—with the Third, Sixth, and Ninth Circuits issuing conflicting rulings on whether the Commodity Exchange Act preempts state gambling enforcement—while three petitions await review at the US Supreme Court.
Why it matters
The legal conflict over event contracts has escalated from regulatory compliance into an existential jurisdictional battle over federal preemption. If state gaming commissions successfully enforce localized geoblocking, prediction market liquidity will fragment, undermining the global informational efficiency of these platforms. Resolution will require Supreme Court intervention or explicit federal legislation to clarify whether CFTC designation shields operators from state-level gambling prosecution.
Exchange operators assert that federal CFTC registration grants exclusive jurisdiction over derivative contracts, rendering state-level gambling bans unconstitutional. State attorneys general argue that sports-linked event contracts are functionally illegal gambling products that harm consumers and fall squarely under state police powers.
Financial disclosures published on Tuesday, November 10, report that Polymarket's annualized revenue has surpassed $1.8 billion, up from $1 billion in June 2026. The platform logged $14.5 billion in notional trading volume in October, driven heavily by multi-leg 'combo' event contracts that mirror traditional sports betting parlays and accounted for over 70% of trading volume on Sunday, November 8. The revenue milestone coincides with Polymarket pursuing a $1 billion funding round at a $21 billion post-money valuation led by 1789 Capital.
Why it matters
Polymarket's explosive revenue growth demonstrates that introducing sports-parlay mechanics drives massive retail trading volume far beyond traditional binary political prediction contracts. However, leaning heavily into sports-like combo products increases political and regulatory exposure as state gaming regulators intensify enforcement actions. For operators across the sector, balancing high-margin retail product features against regulatory scrutiny remains the primary strategic tension.
Platform investors argue that combo contracts provide necessary retail engagement and deep order-book liquidity that subsidize complex macro and political forecasting markets. Conversely, regulatory critics contend that sports combo contracts prove prediction markets are operating as unregulated online sportsbooks rather than bona fide hedging venues.
Adding to the Q3 venture concentration data we've been tracking, Carta's State of Private Markets report released on Tuesday, November 3, shows venture-backed startups raising $49.3 billion across 1,179 rounds, representing a 21% year-over-year drop in overall deal volume. Despite fewer completed transactions, median pre-money seed valuations rose to $19.7 million and Series A medians reached $63.3 million. While down-round frequency dropped to a four-year low of 12.8%, investor-favorable terms resurfaced, with participating preferred stock appearing in over 10% of closed rounds—a six-year high.
Why it matters
Elevated entry valuations paired with declining transaction volume mean early-stage VCs are getting less ownership per dollar deployed, straining fund return economics. The quiet resurgence of participating preferred rights signals that investors are pricing in downside protection to offset high headline valuations. Early-stage founders must carefully audit term sheets, as participating preferred clauses significantly alter liquidation waterfalls and reduce founder payouts during mid-tier exits.
Venture analysts note that high headline valuations protect paper markups for existing investors but mask structural protections like liquidation preferences that quietly transfer economic upside to new capital. Founders often accept higher valuations with protective terms to avoid public down-round signaling, though capital advisors warn this creates severe debt-like overhangs on cap tables.
Creator economy benchmarks for the week ending November 9, 2026, show newsletter subscriber growth plateauing at a modest 0.3% weekly across 40.5k tracked publications, while top-tier 'super-newsletters' capture the majority of net-new signups. Concurrently, publishing reports from Draft2Digital and Indie Author Weekly detail independent authors pivoting away from Amazon Kindle Unlimited exclusivity toward direct-to-consumer storefronts (via Shopify and Payhip) and wide multi-retailer distribution to escape per-page royalty compression and ad inflation.
Why it matters
The slowing rate of raw newsletter growth signals that publication discovery is bifurcating between established media brands and long-tail creators. For independent writers and builders, owned subscriber lists remain vital, but monetization must diversify beyond simple subscription paywalls into direct product sales and network referral systems. Utilizing aggregator tools to publish broadly across global storefronts provides a structural hedge against single-platform policy shifts.
Publishing analysts highlight that direct-to-consumer sales yield significantly higher profit margins per unit while building direct customer relationships free from platform algorithms. However, genre-fiction authors note that Amazon's Kindle Unlimited algorithm still offers unmatched discoverability for debut titles that lack an established, off-platform audience.
Independent publisher evaluations published on Tuesday, November 10, examine the evolving tensions between Substack's corporate expansion and independent writers. Following its $100 million financing round, Substack has introduced algorithmic discovery feeds, Notes, and integrated third-party AI text detection tools. While these features enhance audience discovery compared to traditional email service providers, independent authors critique the lack of control over automated moderation rules and algorithmic visibility.
Why it matters
Substack's transition from a neutral email publishing tool into a recommendation-driven social network changes the deal for independent writers. While built-in discovery loops lower initial subscriber acquisition costs, creators risk becoming reliant on platform algorithms for distribution. Founders and operators using Substack for distribution must maintain direct export rights to their subscriber data to avoid platform lock-in.
Substack advocates point out that network recommendation tools drive a substantial portion of new free and paid subscriptions for rising writers without requiring paid ad spend. Conversely, independent media critics argue that algorithmic feeds inevitably incentivize outrage content and compromise the direct, unmediated relationship between writers and readers.
Contextualizing the friction we saw yesterday when Boundless Foundation paused its zk-ML protocol, a 2026 ZKML industry guide published on Tuesday, November 10, outlines a sector-wide demand pivot away from DeFi speculation toward AI safety, defense, and EU AI Act compliance. Alongside Anthropic's launch of FlashProve, key technical milestones include Attestable closing a $20 million seed round and a16z releasing the post-quantum Lattice Jolt prover. Meanwhile, Realeyes detailed its VerifEye platform combining on-device zero-knowledge proofs with fuzzy extraction to verify age and human presence without exposing facial biometric data.
Why it matters
Zero-knowledge proofs are becoming essential compliance infrastructure for enterprise AI deployments. As regulators mandate auditability for automated decision-making systems, ZKML allows companies to mathematically prove that a specific, unaltered model generated an output without exposing proprietary weights or confidential user data. This cryptographic verification layer helps enterprises meet regulatory standards while protecting intellectual property.
Cryptographic researchers emphasize that post-quantum lattice schemes and hardware acceleration are finally bringing ZK-proof generation overhead down to commercially viable latency levels. However, enterprise software engineers caution that proving outputs for multi-billion parameter models remains computationally expensive compared to running inference inside trusted execution environments (TEEs).
Verified across 2 sources:
Realeyes(Nov 10) · ICME(Nov 10)
Click Copy for AI above, then paste the prompt
into your favorite AI chatbot — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or
Perplexity all work well.
An architectural framework published by Dr. Pravir Malik on Tuesday, November 10, proposes pairing post-quantum cryptography with hardware roots of trust to constrain autonomous AI agents. Citing NIST post-quantum standards alongside implementations like Microsoft Pluton and Microsoft Entra Agent ID, the paper argues that software authentication alone cannot prevent agent privilege escalation. To stop trust credentials from leaking during repeated verification steps, the framework advocates leveraging physical quantum no-go properties—such as the no-cloning theorem—to bind agent execution to hardware-isolated, non-exportable proofs.
Why it matters
As autonomous agents execute high-speed operations across corporate IT systems, traditional software logging risks exposing sensitive session state and API tokens to side-channel attacks. Binding agent authorization to non-exportable hardware trust roots ensures that an agent cannot execute unauthorized actions even if its software runtime is compromised. This hardware-bound security model provides a durable blueprint for enterprise risk teams preparing for post-quantum threat environments.
Hardware security architects maintain that physical trust roots are the only defense against sophisticated credential theft and memory extraction in autonomous systems. On the other hand, cloud software developers argue that hardware-bound authorization limits the elasticity and cross-cloud mobility that make autonomous software agents so useful.
Researchers at Bonn University led by Oliver Brüstle published findings in Aging Cell on Wednesday, November 11, demonstrating the de-aging of human blood cells without resetting them into an embryonic pluripotent state. By extending the reprogramming window over two months, the team successfully reset epigenetic aging clocks by decades while avoiding the tumor-formation risks associated with full pluripotency. Concurrently, MoreBetter Ltd launched a co-investment program on Tuesday, November 10, to capture real-world patient data for cash-pay longevity and peptide therapies operating outside traditional clinical trials.
Why it matters
Bypassing pluripotency removes a major safety hurdle in cellular rejuvenation, bringing partial reprogramming closer to safe clinical application. For builders tracking decentralized science and longevity models, pairing rigorous laboratory benchmarks with real-world evidence platforms accelerates the translation of longevity research into commercial therapies. This dual approach provides a structured framework for evaluating early-stage biotech investments.
Lead researchers emphasize that controlled, non-pluripotent de-aging provides a safe experimental model to isolate specific rejuvenation pathways without cellular transformation risks. Clinical trial consultants note, however, that transitioning from cell-culture benchmarks to systemic human therapies will require years of safety and delivery testing.
Reporting from the Internet Policy Review and Pacific Research Institute published on Tuesday, November 10, details expanding legal and civic pushback against private charter cities and tech enclaves in Latin America. Projects like Praxis in Uruguay (integrating into +Colonia) and Próspera in Honduras attract AI companies and investors via specialized tax and regulatory regimes. However, local civic coalitions are mobilizing legal challenges demanding environmental oversight, public transparency, and local municipal alignment, particularly as resource-intensive AI data centers strain local energy and water infrastructure.
Why it matters
Network states and private charter cities cannot scale purely through top-down regulatory arbitrage and investor capital. As physical enclaves build out high-density infrastructure like data centers, they inevitably run into local political, environmental, and civic friction. Founders designing intentional communities must incorporate grassroots civic engagement and municipal co-existence strategies rather than relying solely on private contractual jurisdiction.
Charter city developers argue that autonomous economic zones spark local innovation, attract foreign direct investment, and establish flexible regulatory sandboxes for emerging technologies. Conversely, local civic groups and urban policy researchers contend that private enclaves create two-tiered legal systems, fragment municipal sovereignty, and divert scarce public utility resources.
As capital deployment concentrates heavily into the late-stage mega-funds we've been tracking, a structural shift is emerging in early-stage lead investing. Following Sequoia Capital shuttering its 17-year-old scout program and closing its London office, senior partners from Bessemer, Andreessen Horowitz, and Insight Partners have departed to launch boutique vehicles, including Chemistry VC's debut $350 million fund. These boutique firms focus on concentrated, partner-led Seed and Series A investments, prioritizing direct operational engagement in response to the high-volume, asset-management approach of mega-funds.
Why it matters
The shuttering of scout programs marks the end of broad, outsourced sourcing networks at top-tier venture firms. For early-stage founders seeking $0–10M capital, boutique funds led by experienced partners offer high-conviction, concentrated board support without the passive asset-management dynamics of mega-funds. This shift rewards founders who can demonstrate clear product-market fit signals rather than relying on peripheral scout introductions.
Boutique fund partners argue that early-stage founders require close, partner-level execution guidance that multi-billion-dollar mega-funds cannot provide when managing hundreds of portfolio companies. Conversely, mega-fund managers contend that massive capital reserves and multi-stage follow-on capacity give their portfolio startups an unbeatable advantage during late-stage scaling.
Legacy Internet Infrastructure Anchors Autonomous AI Identity Rather than relying on proprietary walled gardens or new blockchain protocols, enterprise identity for AI agents is coalescing around proven web standards like DNS, X.509 certificates, and HTTP Message Signatures. Hosted projects at the Linux Foundation demonstrate how domain-anchored registries offer immediate discoverability and revocable trust for cross-organizational agentic commerce.
Federal Self-Certification Velocity Collides with Administrative Audits Prediction market operators face an operational bottleneck as federal regulators move from jurisdictional debates to administrative enforcement. Audits into self-certification filing procedures and rapid product rollouts threaten to slow the listing velocity that exchanges rely on to capture retail market volume.
Protocol Execution Recovers Mainnet Composability Over Rollup Overhead Cheaper L1 gas fees and gas limit adjustments are prompting crypto projects to migrate core operations back to Ethereum mainnet. The operational overhead, liquidity fragmentation, and maintenance costs of dedicated L2 rollups are driving builders to prioritize global composability and lower trust assumptions.
B2B Go-To-Market Shifts from Cold Volume to Real-Time Intent Signals Traditional outbound sales playbooks based on high-volume cold email sequences and static ICP lists continue to suffer from collapsing conversion rates. Modern growth engines are restructuring around real-time technical intent signals, self-educating buyer discovery loops, and machine-readable product documentation.
Late-Stage VC Capital Concentrates in Pre-IPO AI Vehicles Venture capital deployment is increasingly bifurcated as mega-funds pool billions into a small cohort of late-stage frontier AI companies. This capital concentration inflates entry valuations and alters liquidation waterfalls, forcing early-stage founders to carefully evaluate cap-table dilution and term-sheet mechanics.
What to Expect
2026-11-15—Decentraland Creator Fund Beta Season Cycle 1 launches $10,000 USDC reward pool
2026-11-25—Polymarket US deadline to halt sports event contracts in Michigan per court stipulation
2027-10-07—ASIC Consultation Paper 392 transition closure date for operational staking platforms
How We Built This Briefing
Every story, researched.
Every story verified across multiple sources before publication.
🔍
Scanned
Across multiple search engines and news databases
419
📖
Read in full
Every article opened, read, and evaluated
115
⭐
Published today
Ranked by importance and verified across sources
19
— The Distribution Desk
🎙 Listen as a podcast
Subscribe in your favorite podcast app to get each new briefing delivered automatically as audio.
Apple Podcasts
Library tab → ••• menu → Follow a Show by URL → paste