Today on The Charging Station: a dozen EV models exit the U.S. market under tariff pressure, GM's BEV sales collapse 50% YoY — the worst post-credit data point yet — Trump's 25% EU auto tariff puts €18B of German output at risk, Cerebras files for a $40B IPO anchored by an OpenAI compute deal, and the AJ Brown trade hits a 'no binding agreement' wall with Kansas City now in the room. Plus the structural shifts beneath it all — China's software-defined vehicle lead, AI moving from chatbots to operational layer, and AutoNation's captive finance portfolio nearly doubling in a year.
After a brief Q1 share recovery when China ended EV purchase subsidies, the structural picture has snapped back: Chinese brands control 69% of the passenger market and 85%+ of the NEV segment. Foreign OEMs (VW, Hyundai, Nissan) are now signing partnerships with Chinese AI and autonomous-driving firms because they cannot develop competitive software fast enough — domestic brands ship monthly OTA updates against foreign 5-year cycles. The article pairs with Beijing Auto Show coverage where VW's CEO publicly toured XPeng's Level 4 booth and CATL/BYD demoed sub-10-minute charging.
Why it matters
The competitive axis in autos has decisively shifted from mechanical engineering to software cadence. This reframes the Stellantis-Leapmotor, VW-Dresden-BYD, and GM-Gemini stories from this week as a single coherent capitulation: legacy OEMs can no longer build the software stack in-house at the pace required, so they're licensing, partnering, or contract-manufacturing their way to relevance. For B2B sellers into automotive — particularly anyone whose product touches OTA, telematics, AI cockpit, or developer tooling — the buyer's procurement clock has compressed dramatically.
Bull case for foreign OEMs: partnerships preserve volume while they re-architect. Bear case: software is the new platform, and the platform owner captures the margin. Chinese brands are now the platform.
The Kiel Institute for the World Economy now estimates the 25% EU auto tariff (up from 15%) announced Friday will cost Germany approximately €18B in annual output, rising to €30B long-term, with Germany's 0.8% growth rate materially impacted and Italy, Slovakia, and Sweden also exposed. Germany's VDA lobby called for immediate de-escalation talks, citing the Turnberry trade agreement signed last summer. This puts a hard number on the tariff news first reported May 1 and frames the magnitude of the EU response calculus.
Why it matters
The €18B figure is what European automakers and suppliers will use to justify either accelerated U.S. localization (BMW Spartanburg, Mercedes Tuscaloosa, VW Chattanooga expansions) or pulling back from the U.S. market entirely in select segments. For U.S. dealers carrying European brands, the next 90 days will determine whether MSRPs reset upward or whether OEMs absorb tariff costs through reduced incentives and trim mix shifts. Watch BMW and Mercedes Q2 guidance specifically.
EU industry: existential pressure to retaliate or restructure. U.S. policy: this is leverage for further EU concessions. Dealer reality: pricing transparency and customer trust take the immediate hit before the macro effects land.
GM reported Q1 adjusted EBIT of $4.3B ($3.70 EPS, vs. $2.62 expected) and raised full-year guidance, supported significantly by anticipated CAPE tariff refunds — the same refund mechanism Ford disclosed as a $1.3B one-time item in its Q1 results last week. But underneath the headline beat, BEV sales fell more than 50% YoY following the September 2025 elimination of federal EV incentives — sharper than the 27% Q1 U.S. EV market decline and the Colorado 64% post-credit collapse that have been the prior benchmarks in this briefing. Lawmakers pushing Trump to maintain Chinese-vehicle restrictions adds bipartisan policy cover for GM's multi-powertrain pivot.
Why it matters
The 50% BEV drop exceeds every prior data point this briefing has tracked on post-credit demand destruction — worse than the Colorado 64% state-level collapse on a national basis, and confirming that the federal credit was doing more demand-creation work than the Q1 U.S. market's aggregate -27% figure implied. The CAPE refund tailwind is structurally parallel to Ford's $1.3B one-time item: both are non-recurring, and both are masking the underlying new-unit economics. The 800K off-lease EV wave through 2028 and the 100-day new-EV inventory supply figure now need to be read against a demand floor that is lower than previously modeled.
GM management: Sloan-style multi-powertrain flexibility is vindicated. EV true-believers: this is a transient demand pothole and used-EV surge will pull through new buyers. Dealers: new-EV inventory at 100-day supply is the operational reality regardless of strategy.
GM confirmed it will deploy Google Gemini across more than 4 million 2022+ Cadillac, Chevrolet, Buick, and GMC vehicles via OTA, replacing Google Assistant and handling text summarization, messaging, route planning, and conversational tasks. The rollout requires OnStar subscription and Google Play authentication, and lands alongside GM's Q1 earnings beat ($43.62B revenue) despite ~10% YoY U.S. unit decline. This expands what was first disclosed at Google's announcement event into an actual production rollout schedule.
Why it matters
Two things are happening at once: (1) Gemini becomes the default conversational layer in millions of GM vehicles, raising the bar for any standalone in-car AI product; (2) OnStar gets monetized as the gating subscription, which is a meaningful F&I and CRM data play for dealers. For anyone selling automotive software, telematics, or dealer-facing AI tooling, the integration point has moved up the stack — Google now owns the in-cabin conversation and dealers will need to build customer experiences that complement, not compete with, that layer.
GM: software-defined vehicle without the cost of building the model in-house. Google: 4M-vehicle distribution and the data flywheel. Apple CarPlay strategists: the wall just got higher.
At least a dozen EV models have been discontinued or paused in the U.S. in 2026 — including Tesla's Model S and Model X, Honda's entire 0 Series, Volvo's EX30, and multiple Hyundai and Kia EVs — under the combined weight of 25% general import tariffs, 100% tariffs on Chinese-made EVs, the September 2025 expiration of the $7,500 federal credit, and ongoing trade uncertainty. The Next Web's analysis reframes what's been a series of individual model exits as a single structural shift: only domestically produced EVs are economically viable under the new tariff regime. The piece lands the same week Trump announced raising EU auto tariffs to 25% and the bipartisan Moreno-Slotkin bill moved to ban Chinese vehicles and parts outright.
Why it matters
This is the cleanest summary yet of how tariff policy has become EV product strategy. For dealers, the implication is concrete: the import side of the EV showroom is shrinking fast, and the surviving domestic-built lineup (Ford Universal Platform truck, Rivian R2, GM's portfolio, U.S.-built Hyundai/Kia) becomes the entire conversation. Combined with the 800K-unit off-lease wave hitting through 2028, the used-EV channel is now where buyer choice actually lives — and franchise dealers without a used-EV strategy are the ones losing the channel.
Domestic-production OEMs (Ford, GM, Rivian, Tesla Fremont) gain a structural moat. Importers either localize fast or exit segments. Consumers face narrower choice precisely as battery and software tech reach maturity — a textbook unintended consequence of protectionist policy.
On May 1, 14 California Volkswagen dealers filed formal protests with the California New Motor Vehicle Board over EV-transition mandates — specifically capital requirements for charging infrastructure and specialized service bays that manufacturers are demanding but dealers must finance. The filing escalates the dealer-vs-OEM EV friction and lands alongside the Rivian Washington-state DTC ruling and Scout's California legal challenge.
Why it matters
The franchise system is now litigating its way through the EV transition. For dealers, this is the test case for whether manufacturers can effectively force dealer-funded EV-conversion capex, and California's outcome will guide other state boards. For OEMs, it's a margin and timing question — every quarter of delay on dealer EV-bay buildout is a quarter of constrained EV service throughput. Combined with the Autotrader 22% EV-buyer-loyalty data and the off-lease wave, dealer EV economics are under genuine structural pressure.
Dealers: existential cost burden imposed without commensurate incentives. VW/manufacturers: necessary infrastructure for the transition. Direct-sales challengers (Rivian, Scout): franchise system is buckling under its own weight.
BYD reported April 2026 sales of 321,123 NEVs with overseas hitting a record 134,542 units (+70.9% YoY) and accounting for 42.8% of monthly volume — but China domestic sales fell 15-16% YoY for the eighth consecutive month. The company is on pace for ~1.5M units globally in 2026 and announced 6,000 overseas charging ports by year-end alongside its 9-minute-charging battery. The composition shift — overseas now nearly half of volume — is the structural news, not the headline number.
Why it matters
BYD's overseas mix crossing 40% reframes the global EV competitive map. Combined with the Stellantis-Leapmotor Spain plant, BYD-Dresden talks, and Xiaomi's planned 2027 Germany entry, Chinese OEMs are now executing a full-court press on Europe and emerging markets while their domestic price war drags on. For U.S. observers, the bipartisan Moreno-Slotkin ban bill becomes more, not less, likely to pass given the export momentum.
BYD strategy: overseas margin offsets domestic price war. European incumbents: tariffs and tooling localization the only defenses. U.S. policy hawks: validation that import bans are needed before BYD finds a Mexican or Canadian back-door.
Rivian disclosed a 50% production cost reduction on the R2 versus the R1S, achieved through simplified suspension, consolidated wiring architecture, fewer parts across critical subsystems, and renegotiated supplier terms. The R2 is targeted at $45,000 with the Georgia plant ramping to 300,000-unit annual capacity. The cost-engineering detail expands on the earlier $4.5B DOE loan / Georgia expansion announcement with the actual unit-economics math.
Why it matters
If Rivian executes, the R2 becomes the first credible domestic-built mass-market EV in the post-credit environment — directly competitive with the Ford 2027 Universal Platform truck at $30K and the Tesla Model Y. The 50% cost-out playbook (parts consolidation, wiring harness, supplier renegotiation) is also the same template Ford disclosed for the Universal Platform. Expect this to be the standard reference for any mass-market EV business case in 2026-2027.
Rivian: validates the engineering pivot from premium-only to mass-market. Tesla: Model Y refresh urgency increases. Legacy OEMs: the cost benchmarks are now public.
Tekion announced integration of DAS Technology's AI-powered customer data and experience platform into its Automotive Retail Cloud (ARC), enabling real-time data exchange between DMS and CRM systems. The deal follows Tekion's recent integration of Spyne's AI sales agent and signals a broader consolidation of AI-native solutions in automotive retail. Reuters and CDK have not yet made comparable moves on this scale.
Why it matters
For a sales executive selling into dealerships, this is the most consequential vendor news of the week. The dealer-tech stack is consolidating around AI-native platforms with real-time data exchange as table stakes — point solutions that don't integrate cleanly with the DMS/CRM substrate are getting compressed out. The Fullcast finding from earlier in the week (43% AI rep adoption but ROI gated by integration discipline) is now playing out as platform consolidation. Watch CDK and Reynolds for response.
Tekion: building the AI-native dealer OS while incumbents catch up. DAS: distribution to Tekion's growing dealer base. Point-solution vendors: the integration window is closing.
AutoNation reported Q1 adjusted EPS of $4.69 — a fifth consecutive quarter of YoY EPS growth — on record Q1 after-sales gross profit of $593M (+5%), with customer-pay revenue +8% and warranty revenue +7%. The new detail beyond Friday's headline: AutoNation Finance generated $9M in profit nearly equaling all of 2025, with the captive finance portfolio scaling from $1.4B to $2.4B YoY — a 71% portfolio increase in twelve months. The company also filed a $262.25M shelf registration for its ESOP.
Why it matters
The captive finance scaling is the new signal. Prior coverage established that fixed operations and used-vehicle acquisition were emerging as dealer profit centers as new-vehicle units fell 8.9% YoY; AutoNation's transcript confirms the third leg of that shift — F&I captive finance — is now growing at a pace (71% portfolio growth) that materially widens the moat for large dealer groups over independents. The $9M Finance profit nearly equaling all of 2025 in a single quarter is the pace indicator that should reprice how every multi-rooftop group thinks about building a captive lending program.
AutoNation: operational discipline is winning. Lithia/Group 1/Penske: the same playbook is available; execution gap is the question. Independent dealers: scale advantages on captive finance are widening.
Carfax reported used-vehicle prices jumped 2.8% in April 2026 — one of the largest monthly increases since its 2023 index launch — driven by the supply-demand imbalance flowing from pandemic-era new-vehicle sales declines. Ron Almeida at Colonial Ford of Plymouth, MA credits his Super Duty leadership to inventory depth and responsive service rather than aggressive pricing, with dealers reporting intensifying competition with Carvana and CarMax for stock. Dealership Guy's read frames this as the operational counterpoint to the consolidation pressure documented all week.
Why it matters
The April price jump is a clean signal that used-car supply remains structurally tight — and the local New England angle (Colonial Ford of Plymouth) gives a tactical read: stock depth and service responsiveness beat discounting head-to-head against Carvana/CarMax. For franchise dealers in the Boston/Providence corridor, this is a near-term operational tailwind to lean into while the new-EV channel works through its 100-day-supply problem.
Carvana/CarMax: scale advantages on inventory acquisition still real but franchise operators with depth + service can hold ground. New-vehicle dealers: used is the profit center to lean into in 2026.
Boeing purchased 20,000 tonnes of permanent carbon removal credits from Supercritical, bringing recent total commitments to ~100,000 tonnes across three agreements. The credits span biochar and enhanced rock weathering projects in Brazil, Bolivia, Namibia, India, and the U.S., applied against residual Scope 3 business-travel emissions. Boeing flagged tightening supply in high-quality permanence-grade credits and disclosed a 118-point assessment framework. The buy lands in the same week as the Cambridge REDD+ overstatement study — reinforcing buyer flight to engineered/permanent removals.
Why it matters
The contrast with the Cambridge REDD+ finding (forest-credit issuance overstated by 10.7x) is the story: corporate buyers are abandoning nature-based credits for engineered permanent removals, and supply is constrained. For climate tech founders building in biochar, enhanced weathering, DAC, or mineralization, Boeing's 118-point criteria is the de facto procurement bar. Expect verified permanence to command a widening premium through 2026-2027.
Engineered removal startups: validation and demand pull. REDD+ project developers: existential pressure to improve methodology or lose buyers. Voluntary market integrity advocates: vindication.
South Korean steelmaker POSCO signed a joint development agreement with U.S. climate tech firm Electra to scale electrochemical clean iron production, with POSCO Investment making a strategic equity stake. The partnership combines POSCO's direct iron reduction expertise with Electra's electrochemical system producing 99% pure iron for electric arc furnace feedstock — bypassing traditional blast furnaces. This is POSCO's first overseas green-steel investment and lands alongside its 6Mt/year JV with India's JSW.
Why it matters
Steel is ~7% of global CO2 and one of the hardest-to-abate sectors. POSCO putting strategic capital into an electrochemical process — not just a green-hydrogen DRI bet — signals incumbent industrial players are hedging across multiple decarbonization pathways. For climate tech founders, the deal demonstrates strategic-investor demand for non-hydrogen green-steel routes, which until now had been more academic than commercial.
POSCO: optionality across green-steel pathways. Electra: incumbent validation and capital. Hydrogen-DRI camp (HBIS, ArcelorMittal, SSAB): a credible alternative is now strategically funded.
Uber CTO Praveen Neppalli Naga announced plans to equip human drivers' vehicles with sensors to collect real-world data for autonomous vehicle companies — extending the AV Labs program announced in January and partnering with ~25 AV companies through an 'AV cloud' searchable repository. Internally, Uber disclosed AI-generated code now accounts for ~8% of weekly changes and 95% of engineers use AI monthly. The strategic pivot positions Uber as data-layer infrastructure rather than a robotaxi competitor.
Why it matters
Naga's framing aligns with what Pony.ai and Inceptio executives told CNBC last week — the binding constraint on AV deployment is real-world driving data and world models, not language model capability. Uber is monetizing exactly that bottleneck. For founders, the more interesting datapoint may be the internal one: 95% of Uber engineers using AI monthly with 8% of weekly code commits AI-generated is a real productivity benchmark to anchor against.
Uber: capital-light data play with millions of distributed sensors already deployed. AV companies: cheaper than building fleets. Lucid/Waymo/Tesla: Uber just commoditized one of their moats.
Microsoft released Agent 365 on May 1 — a centralized management platform for AI agents across enterprise Microsoft 365 tenants — alongside Copilot Cowork (powered by Claude) and a new E7 Frontier Suite license at $99/user/month bundling Copilot, agent governance, identity, and compliance into a single SKU. The launch reframes enterprise AI from per-tool licensing to governance-first platform pricing, building on the Agentforce Operations launch from Salesforce earlier this week.
Why it matters
The Agent 365 + E7 Frontier bundle is a clear signal that enterprise AI procurement is collapsing toward governance-first SKUs at the platform layer — not best-of-breed point solutions. For B2B SaaS founders, this materially raises the bar on what 'enterprise-ready' means: identity, compliance, and agent governance integration with M365 are now table stakes for new deals. Combined with the Fullcast finding that AI tool sprawl is killing ROI, expect rapid procurement consolidation through Q3.
Microsoft: lock-in via the governance layer. Salesforce/Agentforce: same play, different stack. Standalone AI agent vendors: integration or extinction.
California's AB 1777 takes effect July 1, 2026, allowing law enforcement to issue 'notices of AV noncompliance' to autonomous vehicle manufacturers when their vehicles violate traffic laws — closing the legal gap that previously left driverless cars uncitable. The framework also requires First Responder Interaction Plans, sets testing-mile requirements (50K or 500K depending on weight), and authorizes DMV operational restrictions. The law was finalized last week alongside DMV rules permitting driverless heavy-truck testing.
Why it matters
California establishes the first enforceable accountability framework for AV behavior on public roads — and given that California sets de facto national standards in autos, this is the template every other state will adopt. For Waymo, Zoox, Bot Auto, Aurora, and the Chinese AV firms (MOGOX, Pony.ai) entering the U.S., compliance overhead just became a real line item, but it also legitimizes the category. Expect insurance pricing to follow.
Well-engineered AV operators: regulatory clarity is a competitive moat. Less mature operators: compliance costs become existential. Public-safety advocates: long-overdue.
AI chip startup Cerebras filed for an IPO seeking $4B at a $40B valuation — nearly 5x its September 2025 private mark — anchored by a multi-year compute agreement with OpenAI valued at $10B+. The company makes wafer-scale processors for AI inference and had abandoned its 2024 IPO attempt over CFIUS concerns regarding UAE-based shareholder G42, which were resolved in March 2025. This is fresh filing news, not a recap of prior speculation.
Why it matters
Cerebras at $40B is the cleanest read on how Wall Street is pricing the inference layer of AI infrastructure — distinct from training, which Nvidia owns. It also validates the customer-anchored IPO playbook (the OpenAI commit underwrites the valuation), which is now a template other inference-focused chip startups will follow. The geopolitical resolution (G42/UAE CFIUS clearance) is the structural unlock that changes the AI-hardware financing landscape.
Bulls: inference is the larger and faster-growing AI workload. Bears: same OpenAI revenue concerns that are pressuring Oracle apply here — circular financing risk at scale.
Veteran macro economist Gary Shilling forecasts the U.S. enters recession in 2026 with the S&P 500 declining ~30% by year-end, citing CAPE ratio at dot-com crash levels, weakening consumer spending, declining real disposable income, rising inflation from the Iran war, and a collapse in business capex outside AI. The call lands as the S&P closed April at record highs (+10.4%, best month since 2020) with Microsoft AI run rate at $37B and 84% earnings beat rate.
Why it matters
The bull-bear split has rarely been wider. Shilling's specific points — capex collapse outside AI, real disposable income decline, energy-driven inflation — line up with the NY Fed's K-shaped consumer research and Oracle's 50% drawdown on OpenAI/Stargate concerns. For founders mid-fundraise or executives planning H2 capacity, the asymmetry of being wrong on each side is worth modeling explicitly.
Shilling/bears: valuation gravity and consumer fundamentals always win. Bulls: AI capex and earnings beats are real and durable. Fed: holding rates, watching both.
Oracle stock has fallen 50% from September highs despite 41 of 51 Wall Street analysts maintaining buy ratings with 43% upside targets. The disconnect centers on the $300B Stargate partnership with OpenAI and whether OpenAI can pay for the infrastructure as it reportedly misses internal revenue targets. If OpenAI revenue growth slows, Oracle loses both a major customer and the value of its stake.
Why it matters
Oracle is the canary for circular AI financing risk — the structure where infrastructure providers also fund their customers — and the market is pricing it well below where the analyst community is. This is the same pattern under Cerebras's IPO, Microsoft's $190B capex, and Meta's $145B. For executives reading capex announcements as bullish signals, the Oracle tape is the counter-data: at some valuation level, the market stops believing the customer can pay.
Wall Street analysts: long-term cloud and AI infrastructure thesis intact. Market price: skepticism about OpenAI revenue trajectory. Oracle management: deal structure protects downside (publicly).
ESPN's Jeremy Fowler reported May 1 that there is no binding agreement between New England and Philadelphia on A.J. Brown — only what earlier reporting characterized as a 'wink-wink understanding' targeting post-June 1 mechanics. The new developments versus prior coverage: (1) Fowler explicitly walks back the 'inevitable' framing that had solidified across multiple insiders through April; (2) the Chiefs have separately emerged as an active competing bidder; (3) Times of India floated Tyreek Hill (post-ACL recovery) as a Patriots Plan B. This is the first credible contradiction of the Schefter/Athletic convergence on a post-June 1 deal that this briefing has tracked since mid-April.
Why it matters
The trade has been covered five times as a near-certainty with the June 1 Eagles dead-cap drop from $43.3M to $16.3M as the structural lock. Kansas City's entry as a real second bidder changes that calculus entirely — Philadelphia gains leverage, the Schefter 2028 R1 baseline could move above what New England can justify, and the Chad Graff alternative (2027 R2 + Boutte) may not match a Chiefs offer. The Patriots' decision not to draft a WR in rounds 1–2 — flagged in prior briefings as the condition that makes the Brown trade 'likely' — now looks like a structural vulnerability if the deal collapses rather than a strategic move. OTAs begin May 26; the June 1 window is still the operative mechanic, but it's no longer a formality.
Eagles: leverage just improved with a real second bidder. Patriots: the no-WR-drafted decision is under maximum pressure if Kansas City bids higher. Chiefs: opportunistic entry at a moment when New England's alternative options (Hill, Doubs, Boutte) are thin.
Tariff policy is now the EV product roadmap A dozen EV models have exited the U.S. market in 2026 (Tesla S/X, Honda 0 Series, Volvo EX30, multiple Hyundai/Kia), Germany faces a projected €18B output hit from the new 25% EU auto tariff, and GM's tariff refunds are propping up earnings even as its BEV sales fall 50% YoY. The product mix you can sell is now downstream of trade policy, not engineering.
China's software-defined vehicle lead is widening, not narrowing Foreign OEMs' brief China rebound is an illusion — domestic brands hold 69% of the passenger market and 85%+ of NEVs, ship monthly OTA updates vs. 5-year foreign cycles, and have forced VW/Hyundai/Nissan into Chinese AI/AV partnerships. CATL's 6-minute charging and BYD's 9-minute battery move the goalposts again. Beijing Auto Show was the inflection.
AI is collapsing into operational substrate GM is rolling Gemini to 4M+ vehicles, Tekion is integrating DAS Technology into dealership ARC, Microsoft launched Agent 365 as a governance control plane, and Uber is converting its driver fleet into a sensor grid for AV training data. The conversation has moved from 'AI assistants' to 'AI as the workflow layer' — and dealer tech is squarely in the path.
Dealership profitability is bifurcating along service vs. new-vehicle lines AutoNation's record Q1 after-sales gross of $593M (5th straight quarter of EPS growth) and Colonial Ford's Super Duty inventory-depth playbook both confirm the same structural shift: service, parts, F&I, and captive finance are carrying the P&L while new-unit volume softens. The Q1 dealer profitability data point keeps reinforcing itself.
The market is pricing perfection while macro voices flag fragility S&P 500 and Nasdaq closed April at records (+10.4%, best month since 2020) on 83%+ earnings beats — but Gary Shilling is calling for a 30% drawdown and a 2026 recession, the NY Fed is documenting a K-shaped consumer, and Oracle is down 50% from highs over OpenAI/Stargate circular-financing concerns. The relief trade is fragile.
What to Expect
2026-05-06—EU College of Commissioners formal discussion on Circular Economy Act — critical raw materials policy direction
2026-05-26—Patriots OTAs begin (through June 11); A.J. Brown trade mechanics target post-June 1 when Eagles' dead cap drops from $43.3M to $16.3M
2026-06-28—SpaceX targeting IPO date; Musk compensation plan tied to $7.5T valuation milestones
2026-07-01—USMCA renewal deadline; California AV traffic-citation law takes effect
2026-07-24—Section 122 stopgap expires; Section 301 investigations against 60+ countries must conclude before this date
How We Built This Briefing
Every story, researched.
Every story verified across multiple sources before publication.
🔍
Scanned
Across multiple search engines and news databases
732
📖
Read in full
Every article opened, read, and evaluated
168
⭐
Published today
Ranked by importance and verified across sources
20
— The Charging Station
🎙 Listen as a podcast
Subscribe in your favorite podcast app to get each new briefing delivered automatically as audio.
Apple Podcasts
Library tab → ••• menu → Follow a Show by URL → paste